First off let me say before I begin that will in this article I dry this metaphor wrestling so if you not one for a little creative logic stop reading now. For the rest of you, I will take advantage of the analysis of your bankroll and total poker strategy as a stock portfolio to sketch.
Anyone can win in poker; Indeed would I bet that the majority of people who have ever played at least once in the money was his. Winning in the short term is not and should not the ultimate goal of a poker player, but with a constant rate, profits consistently higher than loses to win. Now, just sounds like common sense, but it is amazing, think as little beginning players about it fully before buying in to a game.
Consider a typical first deposit. Perhaps they have played some home games and are familiar with the basic in and outs. You deposit $60 and buy - in for a $15 sit and go. They come second and win $ 20. increased confidence they book for a $30 sit and go and and behold they out squeeze a win. Feeling sky high they buy for $100 in the hope, keep some big bucks, only to lose and see their entire bankroll drain away. No matter whether you 99 times win 100, if you still lose your entire bankroll of every time bets it all in at the end.
This is an extreme example to be sure, but it is only to illustrate, that you must take into account not only your average winning percentage, but also variations and variants, which can happen in a game with so many random elements.
Risk management
This is where the stock markets. How Poker many brokers have gone through all of their eggs put in bankruptcy on a map and too many shares in the same company. You can make a few gains, but in the long run, it is a risky tactic. That's why almost all merchant of practice so-called diversification, spreading their investments in many different companies so that a loss in one has less impact on the total value of investment instruments.
This is the crucial point, I think, should be considered in the development of your poker strategy. Stocks and shares correspond to the individual play, and the value of the shares is the average value from the game (the chance of winning x amount won) expected. In other words, you always diversify your poker games, should by only buy in the play, the a small fraction of your total bankroll is. In this way, you get to lose every single game more games (different stocks) and spread the risk.
Given the fact that your average mean value of a game is positive, and you buy only in a sufficiently small amount, always in the long run, you win. You are the more careful. You can buy the smaller percentage of your bankroll, and vice versa the riskier you're the bigger you can buy. This is exactly how Chris Ferguson described like me managed to claws its way from freerolls to over $140,000 so far (http://www.fulltiltpoker.com/chris-ferguson-challenge) simply by using the right risk management strategy.
Now, I'm sure some of you because out there say it is not in the spirit of poker play this way and I admit that I often went over the head for a buy-in. But I think it would be to change all of the tables a bit our think benefit, and you see poker strategy from a long-term perspective.
© ThePokerGuide 2011
http://pokerguide.jrwebinfo.com/
Visit us for more detailed poker strategy articles.
0 comments:
Post a Comment